I liked all of the scenes where the women were dancing toppless
Google Videos - student rentals
Search results for query: [student rentals]
in Guadalajara
www.guadalajarastudenthousing.com Guadalajara Student Housing Inc. provides the cleanest, nicest and most professionally managed student housing ...
videos.orange.es
GoArticles Advanced Search Results
GoArticles.com is an article resource site for Authors, Publishers and Webmasters which provides the best collection of expert articles available on the Web
Mobile Phone Deals - Pick the Plan which Suits you Best
In current scenario, mobile phones are of great use to us. They allow us to message, e-mail and browse the internet on the move. As there is an unbendable competition going on among various mobile ph...
Related External Links
Related External Links
Forex – Ordens Existentes
I can’t believe I finally found it. I was an extra in this movie and they changed the name haha as soon as I get I’m buying it
This had good potential but it just fell flat. At one point you’re watching her pour juice like it is some big to-do. Tim Daly is just weird and creepy. Hayden doesn’t make much of an appearance throughout and you never understand why the fascination. Terrible.
This film had potential, but the storyline collapses and really leaves the audience disappointed. First, let me start with the background music. Music plays an important role in a film. The quirky instrumental that continually played throughout the film set a bad tone. I wasn’t sure if I was supposed to be watching a thriller or a comedy. Turns out I was watching neither. The film lacked any sort of thrills or edge of the seat terror. The drama was at a minimum, and the few comedic moments fall flat. If you’re watching this for Hayden, you’ll be disappointed. She doesn’t have alot of dialogue. If its Tim Daly you want, well, his character is a total bore. Overall, the reveal at the end is a let down. The film is only 77 minutes long, but I still felt I’ve been cheated precious moments of my life.
I thought the movie was ok. It had a few twists. Hayden Panettiere as the victim was ok, but Tim Daly pulled the movie through wih his brilliant acting.
Anything with an alluring pose by Hayden Panettiere (is there any other kind of pose she knows?) is worth 90 minutes of your worthless time.
`The Good Student’ delivers what it promises, a modern day `Lolita’ with little Hayden in skimpy outfits.
`The Good Student’ is a dark comedy making fun of modern society in the tradition of `Welcome To the Dollhouse’ featuring dysfunctional families, cops, and small towns, all set to a Danny Elfman style score.
Tim Daly (`Superman’ animated series) stars as our modern day and likeable Humbert Humbert. He’s far too smart and normal to be working as a school teacher in this one horse town. It’s implied he is in hiding as he hides hundreds of thousands of dollars in his trailer home floor boards. He also ignores his blonde next door neighbor whom practically throws herself at him on a daily basis for 6 years.
Humbert’s only form of excitement is drooling over his student Hayden. But how far will he go?
Unfortunately 30 minutes in Hayden departs from the film by being kidnapped. (Presumably by the school’s janitor.) Now the cops and the whole school are looking a whole lot closer at Humbert’s inappropriate behavior around Hayden. Every aspect of his life is on trial.
`The Good Student’ is a dark comedy short on actual laughs but involving characters we actual like and care about. We are also treated to a healthy dose of fan service via up close shots of Hayden in mini skirts.
This is a must see for all die hard (or just hard) Hayden fans.
It defiantly has an 80s feel to it and even thought the movie is a little short and missing some info. The story line was good. In all I have to say I did like it.
This movie plodded on without any interest being developed until the last 30 minutes. Incredibly poorly developed plot. it was every 70′ grade B movie, ending in Rosemary’s Baby. Can I get my money back?
We live in an age of movies custom-made for ADD addled gore-junkies who want to see the same torture-porn flicks re-hashed, or see classic film “re-visioned” into hollywood crap-fests. This movie was a brilliant departure from that trend. Yes, it is slow moving (though without saying much, you do get your body count somewhat early). But the point of the film is to build the suspense, and in that manner it did so very well.
There were some low points…grabbing of the knife at the onset seemed a bit unrealistic. They did force a lot into the last ten minutes and it seemed like they should have developed it out just a little more. But other than that, I thoroughly enjoyed it. Reminded me of past thrillers that seem to now take a back seat to the bloodbath crap or comedy-horror that is en vogue.
I believe this will only get a limited release on Oct 30th in NY/LA unfortunately but right now its ON DEMAND $10.99 before it hits theatres. HOLY *beep* IM SCARED!!!!! So I saw a trailer for this and knew almost nothing about it. A girl takes a babysitting job, said job is actually a cover up and they want her for a satanic ritual. Wow. . wow.. I don’t even know the budget but director Ti West completely captures the essence of late 70′s/early 80′s horror. From the lighting, props, whatever camera he used- this could been straight out of 80s but..it was made last year. The first hour is very slow but never boring..filled with tension and great cinematography. Jocelin Donahue is in every frame of the picture, she captures attention without needing to do anything at all. Her acting is so natural. Anyway its very simple and I watched it alone in the dark at midnight not the best idea but I was flipping out, squirming, yelling at the tv. It’s like BOOM the ending just hits you and its an unbelievable fight to the finish. So scary..and so..real.
WHY DO PEOPLE WATCH THESE THINGS? EVENTUALLY SOMEONE’S GOING TO HAVE HEART FAILURE
AND I THOUGHT JASON OR FREDDY WAS BAD THE MOVIES SINCE THE 80′S ARE GOING WAY BEYOND SCARE WHY DO THE WRITERS HAVE TO SCARE THE LIFE!!! OUT OF PEOPLE
I liked all of the scenes where the women were dancing toppless
Corey Feldman is back in full force in the direct to video triumph of the century. Besides providing a scathing indictment of the american culture of consumerism and unyielding lust for power, this also provides an excellent look at family values and where those time honoured principals fit in today’s fast changing world.
Thought provoking.
Well it’s been a while since i’ve seen corey feldman in anything except in the newpaper or on extra promoting his new reality show..oh yes..his forgettable guest appearance on “Son of a beach”, but his acting in this flick was not half bad and without spoiling anything in the film (you gotta watch it for yourself)he just chose the wrong project but i guess anything that comes his way right now is cool with him (don’t quote me on that!) If your in too a b-grade light comedy that won’t take away too much time in your life..why not go for it (for corey’s sake of course!)
Note: What’s up with the $99,00 price tag!!!
The movie is quite boring to watch. The actors are great, but the whole thing is made in this monotonous mode which makes you fall asleep.
Warning: this review contains adult content. But that’s okay, because you really can’t get a grip on the Holocaust until you’ve had a gynecologist’s eye view of Kate Winslet’s privates.
“The Reader” is pretentious cheese. It isn’t honest enough to be straightforward soft-core coming-of-age porn, or to be a hard-hitting, revelatory Holocaust movie. Rather, it’s a clunky and silly film that attempts to graft the one onto the other and succeeds at neither. “The Reader” brings the viewer in, and then teases him, with a half hour of almost uninterrupted simulated bodily functions, combined with nude bathing. It’s all a great big, high school literature class metaphor about the washing off of guilt, dontcha know. Then “The Reader” devotes its remaining hours to scenes of well-dressed, attractive young Germans sitting around asking and declaring, “Who’s guilty? Aren’t all our parents guilty? I hate my parents.” Overlaying every boring, banal, scene and vapid line of dialogue with ponderous, self-important gas, “The Reader” ultimately succeeds at neither serious discussion nor eroticism.
From top to bottom, the cast is first rate. David Kross is achingly poignant as teenager Michael Berg, who, in the 1950s, loses his virginity in an affair with Hanna Schmitz, a 36-year-old, former SS concentration camp guard. Kross is both intimately human and vulnerable and also larger than life and every bit the compelling, big screen movie star. In that he reminds the viewer of the young Peter O’Toole. May Kross have a long and bountiful career.
In the “deleted scenes” reel on the DVD, there are three fine scenes that could have served as centers of three fine movies. In the most gripping, Thomas Thieme is a truck driver who gives Kross a ride on a backwoods road where a large horse is transporting logs. Thieme is repulsive, so terrifying, and also clearly human and in need of understanding. In another deleted scene, in a conversation with his professor (the always brilliant Bruno Ganz) an attractive German boy admits that his father was an SS guard. In a third deleted scene, a prisoner painstakingly learns to read in a prison cell. That these three fabulous scenes were deleted, while endless scenes of nude bathing were kept, informs you of the filmmakers’ eye on the box office.
In the DVD commentary, the film’s director Stephen Daldry, CBE (Commander of the British Empire), script writer David Hare, and novelist Bernhard Schlink smugly pat themselves on the back. Wearing professorial clothing, tweeds and nubbly sweaters, these graying white men express how mah-velous, perfectly mah-velous it is that they’ve made such a big, fat, profound film that will finally get people to engage in some serious thought about the Holocaust. Significantly, they never mention a single other of the, by now, millions of works of art that got to the topic before they did, nor do they ever address their pimping out Kate Winslet’s privates to make their contribution to the body of Holocaust lit stand out.
Check out online discussions of “The Reader.” Most threads are devoted to such deep and heavy topics as clinically detailed examinations of the tautness and firmness, pendulousness or sag of Kate Winslet’s privates, the straightness or curvature and length of David Kross’, the specific acts that the characters engage in, and what bodily orifices are employed.
This review is not a protest against erotica; it’s a protest against BS. This review isn’t even a protest against the disturbingly burgeoning subgenre of Holocaust porn. In fact there is a brilliant, scathing, unforgettable scene in “Schindler’s List” where Nazi concentration camp commandant Amon Goeth (Ralph Fiennes) menaces his Jewish slave, Helen Hirsch (Embeth Davidtz) as she bathes in a cramped basement. That scene is so powerful and unforgettable because it has two things “The Reader” completely lacks: psychological insight – the viewer knows exactly who Goeth and Hirsch are and what their relationship is to each other, and, thus, complexity and depth, and stylistic sophistication – Goeth does all the talking. He imagines Helen’s replies.
Look, there is worthy art out there about the Holocaust. Read Elie Wiesel’s “Night,” Borowski’s “This Way to the Gas;” Rufeisen’s “In the Lion’s Den,” see “Schindler’s List,” “Europa Europa,” “The Gray Zone,” “Shoah,” or “The Shop on Main Street.” There’s also really good soft-core porn out there, much of it free on the internet. “The Reader” gains nothing, and says nothing, in its pretentious, but commercially shrewd, attempt to combine the two genres.
it was a movie in which you could not help but think about it and analyze it for a couple of days.
The Bottom Line:
A decent film for its first two-thirds despite Kate Winslet’s occasionally laughable accent, The Reader’s lamentable third act turns what could have been a moderately-insightful film about German post-WWII guilt into a middling piece of Oscar-bait with a phoned-in performance by Ralph Fiennes and a whole bunch of contrived, artificial scenes; even in the weak year that was 2008 in film the idea that this middlebrow piece of filmmaking got a Best Picture and Director nomination is ridiculous.
2.5/4
Vastly over-rated oscar hyped movie. Largely nothing happens during this movie.
The first half-hour is kate and the kid in bed with about 30 shots of her breasts.
Then there is a drawn out court process with little complexity or intrigue. The central question of law vs. moral responsibility in the concentration camp is interesting, although meekly explored. Pretty dull movie that doesn’t cover any new ground. Over…rated Saying that, Kate does give a strong performance.
As a former university lease manager, it was a pleasure to read University Wealth: 21 Success Secrets to Buy and Manage Student Rental Property by Marleen Geyen. It is always beneficial to find an expert when you wish to learn about the intricacies of a business. I believe Ms. Geyen proves her expertise as she guides parents, potential investors, property managers, et al., as she explores the almost always lucrative, but also potentially troubling activity of renting to university students.
Ms. Geyen came into this business through a personal connection. She had children attending a university and she needed to ensure they had a safe environment as well as one at a reasonable cost. In fact, there are many parents who find that purchasing a facility to provide a home base for their children while attending a university is the most cost effective. I know of a family that purchased one home that was used for over ten years while their children of various ages attended. If there were time periods in between their children when the building would be vacant, then they rented to other students during that time period. It certainly proved to be a sound and profitable investment.
So whether your interest is just to acquire property for your own children’s use or whether you, too, find that you enjoy working with students and handling student rental property, you will find that Geyen has “been there, done that” and is quite willing to share her knowledge and experience. She moves from considering space, through the financial issues, possible repairs/renovation, into the actual leases with students, and then on to expanding the process into a business, if desired.
I think the one most important thing I personally gained from her book was that an individual considering this business should be able and happily enjoy working with students. Through various personal stories, she shows that her taking a personal interest in the process of renting, as well as the students to whom she is renting, has saved her from many of the problems that a “slumlord” is prone to have. Geyen shows that she cares about both the students and her property. She sets rules, but she also has stopped to consider the personal interests of her renters and has worked out in advance compromises that she is willing to negotiate. She treats students as responsible individuals and they in turn treat her property with responsibility and respect.
In fact, Ms. Geyen’s excellent personal relations expertise shines through as she discusses all of her relationships within the business. Her philosophy is obviously one that works and those reading her book should ensure that they realize that interpersonal relationships is a basic part of her success, quite aside from the actual specialized knowledge she provides.
As is often the case in a self-help type of book, Ms. Geyen uses the concept that readers may have no or little experience. Therefore, she provides step-by-step information. I think one of the interesting little additions to each step is that she includes a couple of questions at the end, undoubtedly received from other individuals, and takes the opportunity to highlight specific problem areas.
The overall philosophy Ms. Geyen presents is that there are basic points in the process that will require specialized expertise–and to plan to choose and use expert advisors. Be prepared for it, she suggests…and be prepared for the entire process, before you begin. She suggests that having the money available, or how you are going to fund a building, be known before you even start looking. In that way, you will be prepared to act quickly when the need arises.
With my background, I found only one new secret–the potential use of an IRA for purchase of student housing as an investment! It’s difficult, she says, but possible. I think that idea alone may be well worth the purchase price for many parents. While the other secrets might not be actual secrets to those who have been involved in real estate investments, nevertheless, I found Geyen’s presentation enlightening, interesting, and a handy resource guide to double check yourself before proceeding through the multiple and sometimes difficult steps in acquiring property, especially for rental purposes.
The sample lease agreement, inspection sheets, and move-out inspection sheets alone are worth your money if this is new to you. I think one interesting point I would want to highlight in studying this book is that Ms. Geyen has obviously already gained and learned from her mistakes. She has taken steps to ensure that problem areas do not happen to her again, by developing what seem to be simple processes that she now shares with readers.
Speaking from experience, do not be fooled and assume this book was not written based upon extensive experience and knowledge…her style of writing allows you to learn quickly because she’s made it so simple…but by developing her secrets, they are clearly, in my opinion, based upon having actually had to work through problems that arose as she started in the business. So, why reinvent the wheel? This book is well worth your time, either in your first purchase for your own children, or for getting into a new and interesting investment area…lucrative, if you learn the “secrets.”